Research & Science
Science-based insights on aphantasia
Aphantasia research has made enormous progress since 2015. Here you'll find all the important scientific findings – from history to tests to current studies.
History of Aphantasia Research
Although the phenomenon has been known for over 140 years, it only received its name in 2015.
Francis Galton describes the phenomenon
The British scientist first documents individual differences in mental imagery with his famous 'breakfast table experiment'.
Adam Zeman begins systematic research
The neurologist at the University of Exeter starts modern aphantasia research.
Case study 'Patient MX'
A man loses his ability to mentally visualize after heart surgery – the first documented case of acquired aphantasia.
Term 'aphantasia' is coined
Adam Zeman introduces the term (Greek a-phantasia = 'without appearance'). The New York Times reports – worldwide attention follows.
Largest prevalence study
Wright et al. examine over 9,000 participants and determine a prevalence of ~1% for pure aphantasia.
The term 'aphantasia' derives from the Greek 'phantasia' (φαντασία = appearance, image) – Aristotle's term for the 'mind's eye'. The prefix 'a-' means 'without'.
— Adam Zeman, University of Exeter
Prevalence – How Common is Aphantasia?
The largest study (Wright et al. 2024, n=9,063) shows: About 1% of the population has pure aphantasia. Including mild forms (hypophantasia), it's up to 4%.
Aphantasia
Hypophantasia
Typical
Hyperphantasia
Source: Wright et al. (2024): 'An international estimate of the prevalence of differing visual imagery abilities'. Frontiers in Psychology.
Scientific Tests for Aphantasia
There are various validated methods to measure mental imagery ability – from questionnaires to objective behavioral tests.
Subjective questionnaire • Gold standard
The most widely used test, developed in 1973 by David Marks. 16 questions about 4 scenarios (person, sunrise, shop, landscape) measure the vividness of mental images.
Subjective questionnaire • Multisensory
Captures not only visual but all 7 sensory modalities. Particularly important for detecting multisensory aphantasia.
Objective behavioral test
A scientific breakthrough: This test shows that aphantasia exists at the sensory level and is not due to misreporting. Aphantasics show no 'imagery priming'.
The Imagery Spectrum
Mental imagery exists on a spectrum – it's not a binary 'all or nothing'. Most people fall somewhere between the extremes.
About 26% of aphantasics report reduced imagery ability in multiple senses, not just visual.
- Visual
- Auditory
- Olfactory
- Gustatory
- Tactile
- Kinesthetic
- Emotional
- Congenital: Present from birth, often only noticed in teenage years or twenties.
- Acquired: Developed after an event like brain injury or surgery – very rare.
Myths & Facts
There are many misconceptions about aphantasia. Here are the scientific facts:
Common Myths
❌ Myth: Aphantasia is a disorder or disability
Aphantasia is a neurological variation – not a disease and no treatment needed. It's simply a different way of processing information.
❌ Myth: People with aphantasia cannot dream
The majority of aphantasics dream visually. The difference: They cannot create voluntary mental images, involuntary ones (in dreams) are often still possible.
❌ Myth: Aphantasia prevents creativity
Ed Catmull, co-founder of Pixar, has aphantasia. Creativity uses many channels – verbal, conceptual, tactile. Visualization is not the same as imagination.
❌ Myth: 'Seeing in the mind' is just a metaphor
Most people (~90%) actually see mental images – for hyperphantasics as vivid as real seeing. Only comparison reveals the difference.
❌ Myth: Aphantasia only affects visual imagery
About 26% of aphantasics have multisensory aphantasia – reduced imagery ability in multiple or all 7 sensory modalities.
Confirmed Facts
✓ Aphantasia is real and measurable
The Binocular Rivalry Test objectively proves that aphantasia exists at the sensory level – not just misreporting or 'poor metacognition'.
✓ Prevalence is ~1% (strict) to ~4% (incl. hypophantasia)
The largest study (n=9,063) confirms: Pure aphantasia affects about 1 in 100 people. No gender difference demonstrated.
✓ Aphantasics have certain strengths
Overrepresented in STEM careers, strong abstract/logical thinking, possibly less susceptible to PTSD flashbacks.
✓ It runs in families
Both aphantasia and hyperphantasia show familial clustering – a hint at genetic components (no specific genes identified yet).
✓ Most discover it late
Typically, aphantasia is only discovered in teenage years or twenties – often accidentally through a conversation or article.
Current Research Projects
Research groups worldwide are working to decode aphantasia:
Merlin Monzel leads a comprehensive research project on aphantasia, memory, and hippocampal connectivity.
Visit websiteStudies on the neurology of aphantasia and the brain regions involved.
Visit websiteAdam Zeman's team, who coined the term aphantasia, continues research on fundamentals and prevalence.
Visit websiteYour anonymized test results help scientists better understand aphantasia. All data is stored GDPR-compliant and anonymized.
Start testKey Scientific Publications
The core studies of aphantasia research:
An international estimate of the prevalence of differing visual imagery abilities
Wright et al. (2024) — Frontiers in Psychology
View paperPeople who cannot generate visual images show no priming in binocular rivalry
Pearson et al. (2018) — Journal of Experimental Psychology
View paperAssessing vividness of mental imagery: The Plymouth Sensory Imagery Questionnaire
Andrade et al. (2014) — British Journal of Psychology
View paper